Apple rejects AG Barr’s claim that it didn’t assist with Pensacola shooting probe

by admin on Jan 14, 2020

Attorney General Of The United States William Barr today asked for Apple’s help in unlocking two apple iphone connected to last month’s capturing at a Pensacola naval base, as well as claimed that Apple had provided no “substantive support” opening the phones. It’s a characterization that Apple rejects. The FBI asked for Apple’s aid unlocking the same phones last week.

In his statements today, Barr stated that the FBI had gotten court consent to search both iPhones, among which had been fired at by the shooter as well as the various other which had been harmed. Barr stated the FBI could take care of the phones, yet noted that the phones are “engineered to make it virtually impossible to unlock without the password,” which is why the FBI needs Apple’s help to unlock them. He called on both Apple and other tech companies to “help us find a solution so that we can better protect the lives of American people and prevent future attacks.”

In an emailed statement, Apple stated it declines Barr’s characterization that it has not provided substantive aid in the Pensacola examination. It additionally shared some information about its responses to the FBI’s requests for assistance.

Below is just how the company states it reacted to the FBI’s demands in December:

Within hours of the FBI’s first request on December 6th, we produced a wide variety of information associated with the investigation. From December 7th through the 14th, we received six additional legal requests and in response provided information including iCloud backups, account information and transactional data for multiple accounts.

We responded to each request promptly, often within hours, sharing information with FBI offices in Jacksonville, Pensacola and New York. The queries resulted in many gigabytes of information that we turned over to investigators. In every instance, we responded with all of the information that we had.

Apple also stated that the FBI just lately requested for even more help– most likely to assist unlock the phones:

The FBI only notified us on January 6th that they needed additional assistance — a month after the attack occurred. Only then did we learn about the existence of a second iPhone associated with the investigation and the FBI’s inability to access either iPhone. It was not until January 8th that we received a subpoena for information related to the second iPhone, which we responded to within hours.

Apple’s declaration noted that the firm’s design groups recently had a call with the FBI to “give added technical aid,” however it’s vague what sort of technical support they may refer to.

Apple can give legislation enforcement iCloud device backups that get on its servers, as it states it has in this examination. Still, it can not unlock a person’s iPhone without the customer’s passcode like the FBI desires the company to do in this case. The firm has said in the past that it’s technically impossible to do so without making a backdoor that might compromise the security of every apple iphone owner. It restated that position in its declaration today, claiming:

We have always maintained there is no such thing as a backdoor just for the good guys. Backdoors can also be exploited by those who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers.

In 2016, Apple rejected a comparable demand from the FBI to open an iPhone linked to the San Bernardino capturing, which brought about a months-long and extremely public lawful battle. The FBI wanted Apple to make an encryption-free variation of iphone that can be mounted on that particular phone so that the FBI can access what got on the device. The FBI eventually discovered a vendor that can aid it open the phone as well as withdrew its situation.